• About the Project
  • Indicators: what we track
    What is Civic Vitality?
    Civic vitality reflects a community’s connectedness and bonds of trust, or social capital, created through neighborliness, friendship, kinship, civil discourse and collaboration. These are strengthened by places to gather, open access to information, opportunities for civic and electoral engagement, effective leadership and philanthropic giving -- although these same assets can be used to exclude outsiders.


    What is Cultural Life & the Arts?
    The Cultural Life & the Arts sector reflect a community’s cultural vibrancy –it includes all of its diverse ethnic traditions and festivals, opportunities for art and music making and enjoyment, venues for the performing and visual arts, architectural heritage, museums and public art.


    What is the Economy?
    An economy is the sum total of an area’s production, distribution, consumption and exchange of goods and services resulting from investments of labor and financial capital in the use of that area’s natural, human and technological resources.  


    What is Education?
    Education is the process by which skills, knowledge and values are transmitted from teacher to student while, at the same time, each student’s potential to think and act logically, creatively and critically is being developed.  


    What is Environment & Energy?
    The environment encompasses an area’s natural resources – land, air, fresh and marine water, wildlife habitat and biodiversity, and the commercial and recreational uses they support – and their intersection with energy sources for and emissions from transportation, commerce, industry and home heating and cooling systems, along with the local effects of global climate change.


    What is Health?
    For an individual, health is physical and mental freedom from acute illness, chronic disease and injury reflecting a good diet, adequate exercise, environmental and behavioral safety and genetic good luck. Individual health outcomes are greatly affected by socio-economic and community-level factors such as access to affordable healthy food, opportunities for exercise, recreation, supportive relationships, degree of exposure to environmental toxins and unsafe conditions, and the quality of one’s education and housing.


    What is Housing?
    Housing meets the basic human need for shelter; for most households it is a major expense or investment that can lead to economic security or insecurity. Housing is also a fundamental building block of livable, vibrant communities and, when blighted it is a source of community destabilization.


    What is Public Safety?
    Public safety is the peace of mind that results from the effective prevention of and/or response to events that endanger or threaten both individuals and the general public with physical, emotional or financial harm. Public safety encompasses both violent and non-violent crime, from domestic and street violence to cyber-security and white-collar crime.
    What is Technology?
    Technology is the development and use of tools, methods and skills to achieve a goal. From arrowheads and the control of fire to ploughs, wheels, engines and computer chips, new technologies change our relationship to the natural world and to the ways in which we live, work, connect and create. 


    What is Transportation?

    Transportation is the movement of cargo -- people, animals or material goods – from one place to another. Modes of transportation in contemporary life include walking, bicycling, cars, buses, trucks, aircraft, freight and passenger trains, subways, ships and boats.


    Crosscut Topics
    Boston Neighborhoods
    Boston is a city of neighborhoods – some, like Dorchester, Roxbury and Mattapan, are as large as some of Massachusetts’ bigger cities, while others, such as Charlestown, are town-sized. Within each of Boston’s sixteen neighborhoods, designated by the Boston Redevelopment Authority as Boston’s official planning districts, are micro-communities, each with its’ own unique characteristics, populations, assets, and challenges.  
    Children & Youth

    Children mirror a community’s values, progress and challenges. If a community’s children are thriving, it is likely that the whole community is doing well. The Boston Indicators Project tracks progress through 2030—Boston’s 400th Anniversary - when many of today’s children and youth will be civic, political and business leaders and their children will be in school.

    Competitive Edge

    The Greater Boston region has a long history as a birthplace of revolution and innovation and is packed with firsts - the nation’s first public park and public library, breakthroughs in medicine and “green” building.  With a newly revitalized waterfront and some of the nation’s - and the world’s - top colleges and universities, the region - with Boston at its core - attracts students from around the world and top-tier talent in all fields to its dynamic  and diversified knowledge economy.

    Fiscal Health
    This cross-cut filter measures fiscal health in several ways: by tracking municipal, state and federal funding as well as levels of philanthropic giving to the nonprofit sector.  In a high-cost city such as Boston, the financial health of individuals and families is another important measure of the fiscal stability and health of the region.
    Race & Ethnicity
    Issues of race and ethnicity - in Boston and elsewhere - generally emerge on two fronts: one is the cultural richness that racial and ethnic diversity contribute to a city and region; the other is persistent disparities in education, health and economic status.  People of color have often faced inequitably high hurdles to educational and economic advancement.
    Sustainable Development

    Sustainable development refers to patterns of growth that integrate environmental and human health, economic dynamism, and social cohesion and equity.  Sustainable development is multi-dimensional by definition: biodiversity health; the availability of jobs at a living age; regional and per capita carbon dioxide emissions; the availability of fresh water and open spaces; etc.  All of these factors increase the quality of life.

    View the Entire Framework
    Complete Framework

    The Boston Indicators Project’s comprehensive Framework of indicators and measures reflects an intensive, participatory selection process that included hundreds of Bostonians and reviewed by thousands more. Beginning with positive goals for the future, these data-rich indicators and measures provide an objective way to assess current conditions, trends over time and patterns of relationships, as well as outcomes for specific groups, neighborhoods, the City of Boston and the Metro Boston region.  The Complete Project Framework can also be re-sorted into crosscutting topics and civic agenda goals.

    View the Complete Framework of Indicators

  • Reports: in-depth analysis
    City of Ideas: Reinventing Boston's Innovation Economy

    The 2012 Boston Indicators Report shows that standard top-level economic indicators don't tell us everything we need to know about the state of jobs and equity in our local and regional economy. We need to reinvent Boston's innovation economy through greater opportunity and shared prosperity.

    Read Our Past Publications Chronicling Boston from 2000-2009

    The Boston Indicators Project produces biennial reports chronicling Boston's accomplishments and the full array of challenges facing the city and region.  These reports build on expert and stakeholder convenings, data analysis, and reviews of recent research. Over the years, they have helped to catalyze an on-going set of conversations throughout the community about our region's economic competitiveness and the key challenges facing Boston.

    The Measure of Poverty: A Boston Indicators Project 2011 Special Report

    The Measure of Poverty was released in September 2011.  Findings show that the rates of poverty in Boston changed very little over the last twenty years, but is more deeply concentrated in single-parent families in particular neighborhoods. State and local budget cuts due to the recession may have long-term consequences in mitigating the effects of poverty.  The Boston Indicators Project released another special report in 2008, Boston’s Education Pipeline: A Report Card, which provided a comprehensive view of the entire arc of Boston’s system of educational opportunities and outcomes, with an update in 2011.

  • Snapshots & Briefs: quick reviews
    Neighborhoods & Planning Districts

    The City of Boston is comprised of 16 Planning Districts and 26 neighborhoods, each with a unique history and identity.  

    This portion of the site is coming soon. For facts and figures about Boston Neighborhoods see the Boston Neighborhood Topic Crosscut Page.

    City of Boston

    The City of Boston is comprised of 16 Planning Districts and 26 neighborhoods, each with a unique history and identity.  

    Metro Boston Region
    The Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) region includes 101 cities and towns. Learn about the region.  

    This portion of the site is coming soon. In the meantime check out the MetroBoston DataCommon for facts and figures about the MAPC region.

    This portion of the site is coming soon. In the meantime check out the MetroBoston DataCommon for facts and figures about Massachusetts.

  • Tools & Resources: find what you need
    Learn more about a topic or do your own analysis through access to research, reports, data and analytical tools.

    Explore our digital library, which archives research reports, journal articles, newspaper clippings, blog posts, media coverage, and more about Boston, the region, nation and world.  Search all by using our sector and crosscut topics as filters.
    By aligning our resources and efforts, we can each make a difference in shaping the future.

    What are the best ways to solve the pressing challenges of our city, region, country and planet?  The Hub of Innovation profiles a set of breakthrough solutions from the region, nation and world.

    Nominate a breakthrough!

  • Shape of the City: Boston's future
    By aligning our resources and efforts, we can each make a difference in shaping the future.
    Greater Boston's Emerging Civic Agenda, created by hundreds of experts, policy makers and community stakeholders over ten years, offers as set of coherent data-driven strategies to move the region forward.  It is organized in four areas, with goals and measurable milestones.
    A Lifetime of Opportunity
    Organized into six buckets, the Opportunity Index tracks key indicators of mobility across a lifetime.  Developed to initiate and inform conversations on inequality, this tool will evolve along with conversations on economic and social disparities.
Race Ethnicity

Issues of race and ethnicity - in Boston and elsewhere - generally emerge on two fronts: one is the cultural richness that racial and ethnic diversity contribute to a city and region; the other is persistent disparities in education, health and economic status.  People of color have often faced inequitably high hurdles to educational and economic advancement. While Boston and Massachusetts have often been at the forefront in passing laws and organizing movements to promote racial justice, these measures have not erased the impact of centuries of economic and legal disadvantage.  Tracking both cultural richness and racial/ethnic disparities offers a yardstick by which to measure progress in achieving racial justice.  This cross-cut filter is designed to track disparities as well as to build upon racial/ethnic diversity as a core competitive advantage and contributor to the region’s cultural and economic vitality.

Indicators in this topic:
1.1.1 Racial and Ethnic Diversity, Boston + collapse
Why is this important?

Diversity augments cultural vitality, increases problem-solving capacity through new skills and perspectives, and strengthens global economic connections.  But highly diverse communities often require community-building efforts to achieve a whole greater than the sum of the parts.

How are we doing?

As of 2010, 53% of Bostonians were people of color compared to just 32% of the population in 1980.  Citywide, 22% of Bostonians were African American, 17% Latino, and 9% Asian Pacific Islander.  The neighborhoods of Roxbury, Dorchester and Mattapan are home to the highest concentration of African Americans in both Boston and Massachusetts while the city’s Latino population mostly resides in East Boston and parts of Jamaica Plain.  Boston’s Asian population is largely concentrated into the small neighborhood of Chinatown as well as the Fields Corner neighborhood of Dorchester.

Enlarge Total White Population Total White Pop Enlarge Black, Asian, Latino & White Populations Enlarge Total Black Population Total Black Pop Enlarge Total Latino Population Total Latino Pop Enlarge Total Asian Population Total Asian Pop
1.1.2 Foreign-Born Populations + collapse
Why is this important?

The term “foreign-born” refers to people born in places outside the United States.  These individuals do not acquire citizenship at birth and are “naturalized citizens” when they do.  According to the Boston Redevelopment Authority, the city’s foreign-born population in Boston approximately contributes $4.6 billion in annual spending, $1 billion in state and federal taxes, and about 52,230 direct jobs for the local economy.

How are we doing?

As of 2010, more than 27% of Bostonians were foreign-born, up from 26% in 2000 and 20% in 1990.  The greatest number of immigrants in Boston live in the neighborhoods of Chinatown, East Boston, and parts of Dorchester, Roxbury, and Mattapan where foreign-born residents range from about 30% to 60%.

Statewide, 14.5% of residents were foreign-born with the highest concentrations in Chelsea (42%), Malden (39%), Lawrence (36%), Everett (35%) and Randolph (30%).

In 2010 Irish remained the largest single ancestry reported by Bostonians with more than 100,000 identifying as Irish followed by about 50,000 identifying as Italian and more than 40,000 identifying as West Indian, of which more than 24,000 were Haitian.  An additional 36,000 identify as English, 28,000 as German and about 25,000 as Sub-Saharan African of which more than 10,000 are Cape Verdean.

Enlarge Foreign-Born Population, Boston Foreign-Born Pop Enlarge Foreign-Born Population, Boston Enlarge Foreign-Born Population, Massachsetts Foreign-Born Pop Enlarge Households by Ancestry Enlarge Households by Ancestry
1.3.1 Corporate Leadership Diversity, MA + collapse
Why is this important?

Diversity in businesses' leadership ensures that the best strategies for growth in an increasingly competitive global economy can be developed and executed.  Businesses also make many important contributions to community life.  As with all other sectors, diversity of leadership in the for-profit arena increases civic vitality and equality.  Prominent examples of representative leadership among Boston’s top businesses help to break the glass ceiling and open opportunities for future leaders. 

How are we doing?

According to the Boston Club, among the 100 largest companies in Massachusetts in 2011: women comprised 11.1% of board members, down from 11.3% in 2010; 41% had no women board members; and, 29% had no women board members or executives.

The Commonwealth Compact is an initiative of Boston's civic and business community that aims to increase the racial and ethnic diversity of leadership and the workforce at all levels.  As of the most recent Commonwealth Compact Benchmarks Report, in 2008 87% of the 111 organizations submitting data reported that employees of color comprised at least 10% of the workforce, including 22% of high-level management positions and 37% of lower-level clerical and technical positions.  Among companies located in Boston, people of color comprised 37% of the total workforce compared to 21% of the workforce in companies outside of Boston.  Healthcare organizations had the highest level of diversity (44% people of color) followed by nonprofits (37%), for profit corporations (24%) and education (22%).  

Enlarge Women as a Percent of Corporate Boardmembers
1.3.2 Diversity of Elected Leadership in Boston and Massachusetts + collapse
Why is this important?

Racial and gender diversity in elected leadership is a key measure of the value of diverse voices in civic life and breadth of a community’s political decision-making capacity.  If all leaders are of a single color, ethnicity, linguistic group, gender, age, level of physical ability, or sexual orientation, it is highly unlikely that a community will succeed in recruiting talented individuals and, instead, will draw on too narrow a range of experience to be truly effective.

How are we doing?

Boston: In 2009, the first woman of color, Ayanna Pressley, was elected at-large to the Boston City Council; a position that has been held by just two African Americans, one Latino and one Asian American in the 100 year history of the City Council.  With two vacant at-large positions, the 2009 election drew the largest and most diverse candidate pool in recent years with 15 total candidates, up from 9 in 2007, of whom six were African American, two Latino and one Vietnamese-American candidate.  Among Boston's appointed government officials, the 2007 Benchmark Report on Diversity in State & Local Government by the Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy found that 27.8% were African American, 11.5% Latino and 6.6% Asian.  Boston excelled in demographic representation compared to all other municipalities with a high percentage of people of color, with only Chelsea exceeding Boston.  This report has not been updated since 2012.

Massachusetts: Despite many recent "firsts" in in both statewide and municipal electoral representation, leadership across Massachusetts remains predominantly male and white.  According to the most recent data and reporting from the Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy and the Massachusetts Municipal Association, women comprised just 20.6% of municipal officials in 2007 - virtually unchanged from 20.9% in 1997.  Likewise, 37% of cities and towns in Massachusetts had no women serving in their government bodies and just 7% had achieved gender parity in their leadership corps. Along lines of race and ethnicity, The Benchmark Report on Diversity in State & Local Government found that top-level state-wide and executive appointments are overwhelmingly white: top state-wide and executive appointees are 89% and 91.5% white, respectively, as of 2007.  There has been no update of this report since 2007.
Enlarge Massachusetts State House Districts House Districts Enlarge Massachusetts State Senate Districts Senate Districts Enlarge Gender and Racial Diversity of Elected Officials Political Representation
1.5.1 Reported Hate Crime by Type, Boston + collapse
Why is this important?

The number of hate crimes reported speaks to both the level of safety in a community and level of acceptance of diverse neighbors and community members.  The Boston Police Department’s Community Disorders Unit classifies a “hate crime” as a simple assault, destruction of property, threats, and harassment with racial epithets.  In analyzing hate crime data, it is important to understand that heightened awareness (and therefore more frequent reporting and investigation) of such crimes may account for an apparent rise.

How are we doing?

The Boston Police Department's Community Disorders Unit investigated 180 incidents classified as hate crimes in 2009--the most recent year for which data are available--down from 229 in 2005 but up slightly from 177 in 2008.  The majority of incidents, 36, were racial harassment and epithets, up from 15 incidents in 2006 and crimes against Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender (GLBT) individuals at 36 down from 51 in 2007.

The majority of hate crime victims were African American, with 64 incidents up from 33 in 2006, followed by GLBT at 36 and white victims at 31.  The lowest number of crimes was instigated against Asians with just 6 incidents.

The majority of incidents, 89, were perpetrated by a white individual followed by 49 incidents perpetrated by an African American individual and 35 in which the perpetrator's race/ethnicity was unknown.

Enlarge Hate Crimes by Type Enlarge Hate Crimes by Victim Enlarge Hate Crimes by Perpetrator
1.5.2 Degree of Residential Segregation + collapse
Why is this important?

Although a majority of Boston’s residents are people of color, Greater Boston and Massachusetts are still predominantly white.  And while increased diversity can add great cultural vibrancy and vitality to a region, persistent residential segregation and can lead to isolation and ultimately drive people away from Metro Boston. 

How are we doing?

Boston and the region remain largely segregated along lines of race and ethnicity, despite growing diversity. People of color and newcomer immigrants are highly concentrated in Greater Boston’s “gateway” cities. 

Within Boston, the neighborhoods of Back Bay, Beacon Hill, the North End, South End and West Roxbury remained more than 60% white in 2010.  By contrast, people of color comprise more than 80% of the population in areas of Roxbury, Dorchester, Mattapan and East Boston.

As of 2010, cities & towns with the highest percentage of African American residents were: Randolph at 377; Brockton at 30%, Boston at 22%, and Springfield at 19.5%.  Since 2000, the greatest increase in African American residents has been in Randolph, +16.5%, Brockton, +13% and Everett, +7.5%.

Quincy had the highest concentration of Asians at 24% followed by Lowell and Malden with 20% and Lexington with 19.8%.  The greatest increase in Asian population was in the suburbs of Boston.

In 2010, Lawrence had the highest concentration of Latinos at 74%, followed by Chelsea, 62%, and Holyoke 48%.  The Latino population is growing the fastest in Revere, +15%, Lawrence +14% and Lynn +13.7%

Enlarge Residential Segregation by Race/Ethnicity
1.6.2 Small Business Loans by Race and Gender + collapse
Why is this important?
Half of all jobs in the Commonwealth are created by small businesses and in Boston - a city of neighborhoods - many small businesses are a source not only of economic development but also social capital.  They serve as gathering places as well as showcases for local subcultures in addition to creating jobs and a sense of community investment.  It is important that such businesses have access to economic resources, which enable them to start and expand their enterprises, and that business loans reflect Boston’s changing demographics as a measure of its civic health.
How are we doing?
Enlarge Small Business Loans
1.7.1 Linguistic Isolation & Multilingual Access + collapse
Why is this important?

Linguistic access not only increases connectedness within a community, but serves as a key in providing basic and fundamental human services such as health care.  While state law requires all acute psychiatric services and medical emergency rooms to provide interpreter services, the number of immediately available interpreters of diverse languages indicates the level of cultural and linguistic inclusion within a community.

How are we doing?

As of 2010, 35.5% of Bostonians spoke a language other than English in the home; 15% of the population over age 5 speaks Spanish or Spanish Creole, 12% speak other Indo-European languages, 7% speak and Asian/Pacific Island Language and 2% some other language.

Among those who speak a language other than English in the household, more than 33% are linguistically isolated—equal to more than 11% of all households in Boston.

The Mayor’s Office of New Bostonians continues to offer an interpreter pool at City Hall drawn from the staff of city departments to assist with licenses, permits, tax information, and consumer concerns. Translation in 24 languages is available, including Spanish, Chinese, French, Haitian, Cape Verdean, and Vietnamese.

Enlarge Linguistically Isolated Households Enlarge Linguistically Isolated Spanish Speaking Households Enlarge Linguistically Isolated Asian Language Speaking Households Enlarge Households by Language Spoken at Home
1.8.2 Community Newspapers by Linguistic Group + collapse
Why is this important?
Newspapers have long been a cornerstone of civic vitality: they let us know about our world, region and community and they connect us with area events and neighborhood happenings in a timely manner.  Newspapers of all sizes and substance—ranging from national to city news, neighborhood and community-based to language or interest-focused—bond individuals and bridge communities through the sharing of mutually-important information. With major newspapers losing circulation and consumers turning to the Internet, pod casts and other technology for news, local newspapers and bulletins help keep communities connected and information accessible
How are we doing?

Boston maintains a strong community-based newspaper system with more than 70 special interest services.  Of those, 24 are ethnic papers making the news available in just as many languages; 28 are neighborhood papers that keep residents up-to-date on the issues pertinent to the community.  Boston also has many free entertainment news magazines and special interest bulletins to keep people connected.  Click here for a complete list of Boston community newspapers from Boston Online or click here for the complete New England Media Directory provided by the Ethnic Media Project at UMass-Boston.

Enlarge Ethnic and Community News Sources
2.5.1 Demographically Representative Leadership of Arts Organizations + collapse
Why is this important?

Measuring demographically representative leadership in Boston’s major cultural institutions enables us to assess their openness to new leadership and ideas; their responsiveness to new populations and audiences; avenues for the expression of Boston’s increasingly rich cultural heritage; and the capacity of diverse constituencies to influence the cultural landscape of the city.  Leaders recruited from diverse sectors of Boston can help to grow and attract new audiences, enrich Boston’s cultural menu with both traditional expressions of culture and new hybrid forms of expression, and broaden participation in the arts.  Representative leadership also ensures that dynamic and talented young people, such as those who attend the city’s visual and performing arts colleges, will not be lost to other, more welcoming cities.

How are we doing?
The most recent data on diversity in the cultural sector comes from a 2007 study by UMASS-Boston’s McCormack Graduate School for Policy Studies that showed racial and gender diversity is high among the 526 Board of Director positions of Massachusetts’ major cultural institutions, and quite closely reflects statewide demographics.  Of those identified, 79% of board members are white, 15% are African American and 3.4% are Asian.  However, Latinos represent only 1.6% of cultural institution board members.  Gender representation on cultural boards is nearly equitable, with men holding 59% of the seats and women with 41% of board positions.
Enlarge Leadership Diversity Among Cultural Nonprofit Organizations
3.3.2 Median Household Income by Race/Ethnicity + collapse
Why is this important?
Incomes in Boston are closely related to unemployment rates and levels of educational attainment.  Tracking income by race/ethnicity in Boston provides an indication of the success of efforts to eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in access to employment and education.  For example, improvements in neighborhood income over time may indicate that residents’ incomes have improved, or that a neighborhood’s demographic composition has changed, with lower income residents moving out and higher income residents moving in.
How are we doing?

In 2010, Boston’s per capita income was nearly $34,000 but with stark racial ethnic disparities.  The per capita income for white, non-Latino Bostonians was over $45,000 compared to about $29,000 among Asians, $19,000 among African Americans and $15,000 among Latinos.  Overall, Boston’s per capita income increased by about 11% between 2000 and 2010, when adjusted for inflation.

Similar disparities exist across households where the median household income for white non-Latino Bostonians in 2010 was over $62,000 compared to $38,000 among Asian households, $35,000 among African American households and just over $23,000 among Latino households.

Enlarge Median Household Income by Race Ethnicity Median Household Income by Race in Boston Enlarge Median Household Income by Town Median Household Income in MA Enlarge Median Household Income Boston
3.3.3 Unemployment by Race/Ethnicity and Education + collapse
Why is this important?
Unemployment rates describe a mismatch between people of working age in a community and the jobs available to them.  Unemployment in particular communities may indicate that the workforce is not prepared for the types of job offered.  It may also indicate that people, while prepared, cannot access jobs, due to a lack of networking, transportation or other, more subtle, impediments.
How are we doing?
Though Boston’s city-wide unemployment rate dropped below 6% in early 2012, deep racial/ethnic disparities persist.  As of 2010 when the city-wide rate was 8.6%, the unemployment rate for white, non-Latino Bostonians 16 years and older was 6.5% compared to 12% among Asians, 21% among Latinos and 24% among African American Bostonians 16 years and older.

Deep disparities in employment persist along lines of educational attainment in Boston as elsewhere.  Averaged between 2006-2010, the unemployment rate for Bostonians between the ages of 25 and 64 without a High School diploma was over 12%.  For those with a High School Diploma the unemployment rate was 12%, and for those with some college education 11% were unemployed.  By comparison, among Bostonains with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher the unemployment rate was about 4%.  

Furthermore, labor force participation increases with educational attainment.  Roughly 35% of those without a High School diploma were not in the labor force as well as 25% of those with a High School diploma, 19% of those with some college and 12% of those with a Bachelor's Degree or higher.  Working-age adults who are not active in the labor force are not counted in official unemployment rates.  

Enlarge Unemployment by Race/Ethnicity Enlarge Unemployment by Educational Attainment Enlarge Unemployment by Neighborhood
6.3.1 Low Birthweight by Race/Ethnicity + collapse
Why is this important?
A baby who is carried to full term and born at a healthy weight reduces the risk of infant mortality, later developmental and educational delays, and a number of adult health problems such as asthma, high blood pressure and type II diabetes.
How are we doing?
Enlarge Low Birthweight by Race/Ethnicity Enlarge Measure needed
6.3.2 Obesity + collapse
Why is this important?
Obesity is a risk factor for largely preventable hypertension, asthma, Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, strokes and some cancers.
How are we doing?
Enlarge Adult Obesity by Race Enlarge Obesity Rates Enlarge Percent of BPS High School Student Who are Overweight or Obese
6.4.4 Healthy Behaviors + collapse
Why is this important?
How are we doing?
Enlarge Percent of BPS High School Students without Physical Education Enlarge Percent of BPS High School Students Without 60 Minutes of Weekly Physical Activity Enlarge Percent of BPS High School Students Who Consume at Least One Soda Per Day
8.4.2 Trends in Reported Hate Crimes in Boston + collapse
Why is this important?

The number of hate crimes reported speaks to both the level of safety in a community and level of acceptance of diverse neighbors and community members.  The Boston Police Department’s Community Disorders Unit classifies a “hate crime” as a simple assault, destruction of property, threats, and harassment with racial epithets.  In analyzing hate crime data, it is important to understand that heightened awareness (and therefore more frequent reporting and investigation) of such crimes may account for an apparent rise.

How are we doing?

The number of hate crimes in Boston investigated by the Community Disorders Unit of the Boston Police Department (BPD) continued to decline overall, reaching an all-time low of 169 in 2006, despite a slight increase in 2005 to 219 reported incidents. 

According to the BPD, the greatest number of hate crimes in 2006—roughly 30%—were perpetrated on the basis of sexual orientation.  For the first time, African Americans comprised the second largest group of victims with 33—or 20%—reported incidents in 2006, down from 65—or 30%—in 2005.  Jewish people experienced the largest increase in perpetrated hate crimes in 2006 with 24 reported incidents, double the number in 2005 and up from just 9 in 2004.  Crimes against Middle Eastern people declined to 8 incidents in 2006 from 20 in 2004.

According to the BPD, the Police District including South Boston reported the highest number and percentage of hate and miscellaneous crimes for 2006 with 43 incidents—roughly 20%—followed by Central/Beacon Hill and Dorchester, both with 27 incidents, and the South End/Back Bay District with 26 incidents.  Mattapan experienced the largest decrease in incidents with 6 in 2006, down from 18 in 2005.  Allston/Brighton and Hyde Park also experienced 9 fewer hate crimes in 2006 than in 2005. 

Enlarge Hate Crimes by Type Enlarge 842bPerp Enlarge 842cVic
8.5.1 Juvenile Crime Rates + collapse
Why is this important?

Research conducted by Harvard University found that just 1% of Boston's 16-24 year olds drive over 50% of all gun-related violence in the city.  Reductions in youth violent crime not only ensures a safer experience for the city's young people, but for all residents

How are we doing?

Overall youth crime declined from a high of 9,457 incidents in 2006 to 7,101 incidents in 2009, according to the more recently available data from the Boston Police Department.  This decline was largely due to a decrease in Part 2, or quality of life, crimes committed by youth in Boston as the total number of violent and property crimes committed by those under 24 remained at about 3,000 incidents.  The decline was also driven by a falling number of incidents involving very young youth under the age of 16.

Additionally, the percent of teens in Boston who reported carrying a gun within the previous month continued to fall to just 3.3% in 2011 compared to 10% of teens in 1993.  The racial/ethnic gap has all but closed when it comes to carrying weapons: 3.9% of African Americans, 3.5% of white and 2.8% of Latinos reported carrying a gun in 2011 compared to 15.3%, 4.7% and 9.6%, respectively, in 1993.

Enlarge Youth Crime, Ages 14 to 24 Enlarge Youth Violent Crimes, Under 16 Enlarge Percent of Youth Who Have Carried a Weapon
Featured Data Visualizations: